Core i7-1065G7 vs Ryzen 3 2200G
Description
The i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the 2200G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1065G7 is 1.4 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-1065G7 is 1.4 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706e5
810f10
Core
Ice Lake-U
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2019
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
74.82k points
44.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
214.34k points
157.54k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1065G7
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
28.19k
13.75k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
22.13k
22.58k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.32k
4.99k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.17k
3.55k (x0.25)
TOTAL
74.82k
44.87k (x0.6)
Multithread
i7-1065G7
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
86.39k
50.99k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
86.22k
84.4k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.99k
18.95k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
3.2k (x0.37)
TOTAL
214.34k
157.54k (x0.74)
Performance/W
i7-1065G7
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
5759 points/W
785 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5748 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2199 points/W
292 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
583 points/W
49 points/W
TOTAL
14289 points/W
2424 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-1065G7
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
7229 points/GHz
3716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5675 points/GHz
6102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2646 points/GHz
1350 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3634 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
TOTAL
19184 points/GHz
12126 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4