| | | | | | |

Core i7-1065G7 vs i3-12100F


Description
The i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake architecture while the i3-12100F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-1065G7 gets a score of 214.3 k points while the i3-12100F gets 340.5 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-12100F is 1.6 times faster than the i7-1065G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706e5
90675
Core
Ice Lake-U
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1526
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
58 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x48 kB
4x32+x4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
74.82k points
88.81k points
Mean multithread perf.
214.34k points
340.49k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-1065G7
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
28.19k
39.54k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
22.13k
23.79k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.32k
11.96k (x1.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.17k
13.52k (x0.95)
TOTAL
74.82k
88.81k (x1.19)

Multithread

i7-1065G7

i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
86.39k
148k (x1.71)
Test#2 (FP)
86.22k
123.08k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.99k
52.73k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.75k
16.67k (x1.91)
TOTAL
214.34k
340.49k (x1.59)

Performance/W
i7-1065G7
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
5759 points/W
2552 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5748 points/W
2122 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2199 points/W
909 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
583 points/W
287 points/W
TOTAL
14289 points/W
5871 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-1065G7
i3-12100F
Test#1 (Integers)
7229 points/GHz
9195 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5675 points/GHz
5532 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2646 points/GHz
2781 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3634 points/GHz
3144 points/GHz
TOTAL
19184 points/GHz
20652 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4