Core i7-10610U vs i7-8650U
Description
The i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-8650U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10610U gets a score of 162 k points while the i7-8650U gets 173.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8650U is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10610U gets a score of 162 k points while the i7-8650U gets 173.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8650U is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
806ea
Core
Comet Lake-U
Kaby Lake-R
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1528
BGA 1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
25 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
May 2020
August 2017
Mean monothread perf.
56.65k points
55.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
162k points
173.49k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10610U
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
23.1k
21.61k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
20k
19.69k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
4.61k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.94k
9.95k (x1.11)
TOTAL
56.65k
55.86k (x0.99)
Multithread
i7-10610U
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
73.36k
78.38k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
68.28k
72.02k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.73k
16.95k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
6.15k (x0.93)
TOTAL
162k
173.49k (x1.07)
Performance/W
i7-10610U
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
2934 points/W
5225 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2731 points/W
4802 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
549 points/W
1130 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
410 points/W
TOTAL
6480 points/W
11566 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10610U
i7-8650U
Test#1 (Integers)
4715 points/GHz
5146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4082 points/GHz
4689 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
940 points/GHz
1097 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1825 points/GHz
2368 points/GHz
TOTAL
11562 points/GHz
13300 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4