Core i7-10610U vs i5-9400F
Description
The i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-9400F is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10610U gets a score of 162 k points while the i5-9400F gets 331.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9400F is 2 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10610U gets a score of 162 k points while the i5-9400F gets 331.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9400F is 2 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
906ea
Core
Comet Lake-U
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1528
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/6
TDP
25 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
9216 kB
Date
May 2020
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.65k points
67.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
162k points
331.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10610U
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
23.1k
27.15k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
20k
23.63k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
5.38k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.94k
11.61k (x1.3)
TOTAL
56.65k
67.77k (x1.2)
Multithread
i7-10610U
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
73.36k
156.61k (x2.13)
Test#2 (FP)
68.28k
138k (x2.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.73k
29.45k (x2.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
7.14k (x1.08)
TOTAL
162k
331.19k (x2.04)
Performance/W
i7-10610U
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2934 points/W
2409 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2731 points/W
2123 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
549 points/W
453 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
110 points/W
TOTAL
6480 points/W
5095 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10610U
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4715 points/GHz
6622 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4082 points/GHz
5763 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
940 points/GHz
1312 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1825 points/GHz
2831 points/GHz
TOTAL
11562 points/GHz
16528 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4