| | | | | | |

Core i7-10610U vs i5-10400T


Description
Both models i7-10610U and i5-10400T are based on Comet Lake architecture.

Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10610U gets a score of 162 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 1.9 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
a0653
Core
Comet Lake-U
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1528
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
25 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
May 2020
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.65k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
162k points
307.18k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10610U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
23.1k
22k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
20k
19.98k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
4.57k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.94k
11.31k (x1.26)
TOTAL
56.65k
57.85k (x1.02)

Multithread

i7-10610U

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
73.36k
136.69k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
68.28k
135.25k (x1.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.73k
32.76k (x2.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
2.48k (x0.37)
TOTAL
162k
307.18k (x1.9)

Performance/W
i7-10610U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
2934 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2731 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
549 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
6480 points/W
8776 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10610U
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
4715 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4082 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
940 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1825 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
11562 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4