| | | | | | |

Core i7-10610U vs i5-1035G1


Description
The i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10610U gets a score of 162 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
706e5
Core
Comet Lake-U
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1528
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
25 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
May 2020
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.65k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
162k points
171.65k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10610U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
23.1k
21.5k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
20k
17.71k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
7.92k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.94k
8.24k (x0.92)
TOTAL
56.65k
55.37k (x0.98)

Multithread

i7-10610U

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
73.36k
73.03k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
68.28k
68.19k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.73k
24.89k (x1.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
5.54k (x0.84)
TOTAL
162k
171.65k (x1.06)

Performance/W
i7-10610U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
2934 points/W
4869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2731 points/W
4546 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
549 points/W
1660 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
369 points/W
TOTAL
6480 points/W
11443 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10610U
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
4715 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4082 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
940 points/GHz
2201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1825 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
11562 points/GHz
15381 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4