Core i7-10610U vs i5-10210U
Description
Both models i7-10610U and i5-10210U are based on Comet Lake architecture.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10610U gets a score of 162 k points while the i5-10210U gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10610U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Comet Lake was released in 2019 as a 14nm process-refinement. These models were released as 10th generation CPUs like 10nm Ice Lake. There are model with 2 to 10 cores.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10610U gets a score of 162 k points while the i5-10210U gets 147.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10610U is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
806ec
Core
Comet Lake-U
Comet Lake-U
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1528
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
25 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
May 2020
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.65k points
56.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
162k points
147.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10610U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
23.1k
22.96k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
20k
20.8k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
4.76k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.94k
7.5k (x0.84)
TOTAL
56.65k
56.03k (x0.99)
Multithread
i7-10610U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
73.36k
66.43k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
68.28k
62.38k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.73k
14.52k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
4.45k (x0.67)
TOTAL
162k
147.78k (x0.91)
Performance/W
i7-10610U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
2934 points/W
4429 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2731 points/W
4158 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
549 points/W
968 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
297 points/W
TOTAL
6480 points/W
9852 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10610U
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
4715 points/GHz
5468 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4082 points/GHz
4953 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
940 points/GHz
1134 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1825 points/GHz
1785 points/GHz
TOTAL
11562 points/GHz
13340 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4