Core i7-10610U vs i3-6100
Description
The i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-6100 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10610U gets a score of 162 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10610U is 1.4 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10610U gets a score of 162 k points while the i3-6100 gets 112.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10610U is 1.4 times faster than the i3-6100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
506e3
Core
Comet Lake-U
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1528
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/2
TDP
25 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
May 2020
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
56.65k points
52.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
162k points
112.28k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10610U
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
23.1k
22.89k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
20k
21.04k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
4.9k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.94k
4.01k (x0.45)
TOTAL
56.65k
52.84k (x0.93)
Multithread
i7-10610U
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
73.36k
50.05k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
68.28k
47.13k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.73k
11.38k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
3.72k (x0.56)
TOTAL
162k
112.28k (x0.69)
Performance/W
i7-10610U
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
2934 points/W
981 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2731 points/W
924 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
549 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
73 points/W
TOTAL
6480 points/W
2202 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10610U
i3-6100
Test#1 (Integers)
4715 points/GHz
6187 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4082 points/GHz
5686 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
940 points/GHz
1325 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1825 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
11562 points/GHz
14282 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4