| | | | | | |

Core i7-10610U vs Ryzen 9 5900HS


Description
The i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5900HS is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10610U gets a score of 162 k points while the 5900HS gets 435 k points.

Summarizing, the 5900HS is 2.7 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
a50f00
Core
Comet Lake-U
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1528
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
25 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
May 2020
December 2021
Mean monothread perf.
56.65k points
81.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
162k points
434.96k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10610U
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
23.1k
21.2k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
20k
25k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
11.44k (x2.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.94k
24.22k (x2.71)
TOTAL
56.65k
81.87k (x1.44)

Multithread

i7-10610U

5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
73.36k
145.13k (x1.98)
Test#2 (FP)
68.28k
198.36k (x2.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.73k
85.67k (x6.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
5.79k (x0.87)
TOTAL
162k
434.96k (x2.68)

Performance/W
i7-10610U
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
2934 points/W
4147 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2731 points/W
5667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
549 points/W
2448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
6480 points/W
12427 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10610U
5900HS
Test#1 (Integers)
4715 points/GHz
4608 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4082 points/GHz
5436 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
940 points/GHz
2488 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1825 points/GHz
5266 points/GHz
TOTAL
11562 points/GHz
17797 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4