| | | | | | |

Core i7-10610U vs Ryzen 9 3900X


Description
The i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3900X is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10610U gets a score of 162 k points while the 3900X gets 756.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 3900X is 4.7 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-U
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/24
TDP
25 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
May 2020
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.65k points
72.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
162k points
756.3k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10610U
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
23.1k
16.73k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
20k
24.74k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
8.82k (x1.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.94k
22.22k (x2.49)
TOTAL
56.65k
72.51k (x1.28)

Multithread

i7-10610U

3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
73.36k
248.24k (x3.38)
Test#2 (FP)
68.28k
309.66k (x4.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.73k
140.01k (x10.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
58.39k (x8.81)
TOTAL
162k
756.3k (x4.67)

Performance/W
i7-10610U
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
2934 points/W
2364 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2731 points/W
2949 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
549 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
556 points/W
TOTAL
6480 points/W
7203 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10610U
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
4715 points/GHz
3638 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4082 points/GHz
5377 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
940 points/GHz
1917 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1825 points/GHz
4831 points/GHz
TOTAL
11562 points/GHz
15763 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4