Core i7-10610U vs Ryzen 9 3900
Description
The i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3900 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10610U gets a score of 162 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 4.2 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10610U gets a score of 162 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 4.2 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-U
Matisse
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/24
TDP
25 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
May 2020
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
56.65k points
74.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
162k points
687.5k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10610U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
23.1k
16.85k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
20k
26.03k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
9.54k (x2.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.94k
22.55k (x2.52)
TOTAL
56.65k
74.97k (x1.32)
Multithread
i7-10610U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
73.36k
229.41k (x3.13)
Test#2 (FP)
68.28k
292.81k (x4.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.73k
128.48k (x9.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
36.8k (x5.56)
TOTAL
162k
687.5k (x4.24)
Performance/W
i7-10610U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
2934 points/W
3529 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2731 points/W
4505 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
549 points/W
1977 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
566 points/W
TOTAL
6480 points/W
10577 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10610U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
4715 points/GHz
3920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4082 points/GHz
6054 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
940 points/GHz
2218 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1825 points/GHz
5243 points/GHz
TOTAL
11562 points/GHz
17435 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4