Core i7-10610U vs Ryzen 5 5600X
Description
The i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 5600X is based on Zen 3.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10610U gets a score of 162 k points while the 5600X gets 435.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600X is 2.7 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10610U gets a score of 162 k points while the 5600X gets 435.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 5600X is 2.7 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
a20f10
Core
Comet Lake-U
Vermeer
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
25 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
32768 kB
Date
May 2020
November 2020
Mean monothread perf.
56.65k points
86.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
162k points
435.05k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10610U
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
23.1k
23.28k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
20k
25.58k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
11.72k (x2.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.94k
25.45k (x2.85)
TOTAL
56.65k
86.03k (x1.52)
Multithread
i7-10610U
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
73.36k
135.28k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
68.28k
180.56k (x2.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.73k
80.27k (x5.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
38.94k (x5.88)
TOTAL
162k
435.05k (x2.69)
Performance/W
i7-10610U
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
2934 points/W
2081 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2731 points/W
2778 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
549 points/W
1235 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
599 points/W
TOTAL
6480 points/W
6693 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10610U
5600X
Test#1 (Integers)
4715 points/GHz
5061 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4082 points/GHz
5562 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
940 points/GHz
2548 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1825 points/GHz
5533 points/GHz
TOTAL
11562 points/GHz
18702 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4