| | | | | | |

Core i7-10610U vs Ryzen 5 2600


Description
The i7-10610U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10610U gets a score of 162 k points while the 2600 gets 292.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.8 times faster than the i7-10610U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
800f82
Core
Comet Lake-U
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
FCBGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
25 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
May 2020
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
56.65k points
57.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
162k points
292.31k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10610U
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
23.1k
13.83k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
20k
23.16k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.61k
5.15k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.94k
15.18k (x1.7)
TOTAL
56.65k
57.33k (x1.01)

Multithread

i7-10610U

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
73.36k
83.44k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
68.28k
161.53k (x2.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
13.73k
40.62k (x2.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.62k
6.72k (x1.01)
TOTAL
162k
292.31k (x1.8)

Performance/W
i7-10610U
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
2934 points/W
1284 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2731 points/W
2485 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
549 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
265 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
6480 points/W
4497 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10610U
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
4715 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4082 points/GHz
5938 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
940 points/GHz
1321 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1825 points/GHz
3893 points/GHz
TOTAL
11562 points/GHz
14699 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4