Core i7-10510U vs Xeon X5670
Description
The i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the X5670 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 168.7 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10510U is 1.5 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 168.7 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10510U is 1.5 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
206c2
Core
Comet Lake-U
Westmere-EP
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.933 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/8
6 /6
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2019
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
59.01k points
20.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
190.82k points
115.4k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10510U
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
17.66k
8.35k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
25.46k
5.58k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.4k
3.32k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.05k
3k (x0.21)
TOTAL
63.57k
20.26k (x0.32)
Multithread
i7-10510U
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
54.45k
49.72k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
84.97k
35.19k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.26k
21.88k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.04k
8.6k (x1.07)
TOTAL
168.72k
115.4k (x0.68)
Performance/W
i7-10510U
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
3630 points/W
523 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5665 points/W
370 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1417 points/W
230 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
536 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
11248 points/W
1215 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10510U
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
3604 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5196 points/GHz
1675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1307 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2867 points/GHz
900 points/GHz
TOTAL
12974 points/GHz
6078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4