| | | | | | |

Core i7-10510U vs Xeon E5-2670 v3


Description
The i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 190.8 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 2.4 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
306f2
Core
Comet Lake-U
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/24
TDP
15 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
30720 kB
Date
August 2019
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
59.01k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
190.82k points
452.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10510U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4.91k
3.52k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
20.01k
8.68k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.05k
2.83k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.16k
3.13k (x0.22)
TOTAL
45.13k
18.17k (x0.4)

Multithread

i7-10510U

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
13.79k
32.7k (x2.37)
Test#2 (FP)
70.21k
105.18k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.05k
35.18k (x1.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.04k
9.54k (x1.19)
TOTAL
112.09k
182.59k (x1.63)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10510U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
17.66k
11.08k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
25.46k
9.57k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.4k
3.18k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.05k
3.28k (x0.23)
TOTAL
63.57k
27.11k (x0.43)

Multithread

i7-10510U

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
54.45k
139.07k (x2.55)
Test#2 (FP)
84.97k
133.47k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.26k
46.6k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.04k
6.65k (x0.83)
TOTAL
168.72k
325.78k (x1.93)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10510U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
17.52k
11.18k (x0.64)
Test#2 (FP)
26.74k
10.06k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
3.21k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.33k
3.12k (x0.23)
TOTAL
63.81k
27.57k (x0.43)

Multithread

i7-10510U

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
54.53k
140.98k (x2.59)
Test#2 (FP)
85.61k
145.37k (x1.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.87k
45.62k (x2.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.05k
6.75k (x0.84)
TOTAL
169.07k
338.73k (x2)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10510U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
22.85k
18.62k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
21.15k
10.49k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
4.04k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.24k
3.26k (x0.32)
TOTAL
59.01k
36.41k (x0.62)

Multithread

i7-10510U

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
86.08k
236.25k (x2.74)
Test#2 (FP)
79.78k
151.05k (x1.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.26k
58.9k (x3.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.69k
6.7k (x1)
TOTAL
190.82k
452.9k (x2.37)

Performance/W
i7-10510U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
5739 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5319 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1217 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
446 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
12721 points/W
3774 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10510U
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4664 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4316 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
975 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2089 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
12044 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4