Core i7-10510U vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 190.8 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 190.8 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
406f1
Core
Comet Lake-U
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
20480 kB
Date
August 2019
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
59.01k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
190.82k points
237.83k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10510U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
4.91k
2.6k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
20.01k
7.55k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.05k
2.61k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.16k
2.03k (x0.14)
TOTAL
45.13k
14.79k (x0.33)
Multithread
i7-10510U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.79k
17.41k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
70.21k
75.46k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.05k
26.25k (x1.31)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.04k
4.65k (x0.58)
TOTAL
112.09k
123.78k (x1.1)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10510U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
17.66k
8.22k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
25.46k
12.06k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.4k
4.01k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.05k
2.89k (x0.21)
TOTAL
63.57k
27.18k (x0.43)
Multithread
i7-10510U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
54.45k
61.34k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
84.97k
90.21k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.26k
26.2k (x1.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.04k
4.62k (x0.58)
TOTAL
168.72k
182.37k (x1.08)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10510U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
17.52k
6.04k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
26.74k
10.18k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
2.74k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.33k
2.41k (x0.18)
TOTAL
63.81k
21.37k (x0.33)
Multithread
i7-10510U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
54.53k
47.51k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
85.61k
75.12k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.87k
19.72k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.05k
5.45k (x0.68)
TOTAL
169.07k
147.8k (x0.87)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10510U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
22.85k
12.16k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
21.15k
11.82k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
3.02k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.24k
2.4k (x0.23)
TOTAL
59.01k
29.39k (x0.5)
Multithread
i7-10510U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
86.08k
103.77k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
79.78k
102.28k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.26k
26.13k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.69k
5.65k (x0.84)
TOTAL
190.82k
237.83k (x1.25)
Performance/W
i7-10510U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5739 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5319 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1217 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
446 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
12721 points/W
2798 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10510U
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
4664 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4316 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
975 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2089 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
12044 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4