Core i7-10510U vs Xeon E5-2620
Description
The i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the E5-2620 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 169.1 k points while the E5-2620 gets 224.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 169.1 k points while the E5-2620 gets 224.7 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
206d7
Core
Comet Lake-U
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
2.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
15360 kB
Date
August 2019
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
59.01k points
18.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
190.82k points
224.7k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10510U
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
17.52k
6.95k (x0.4)
Test#2 (FP)
26.74k
6.24k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
3.05k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.33k
2.56k (x0.19)
TOTAL
63.81k
18.8k (x0.29)
Multithread
i7-10510U
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
54.53k
90.01k (x1.65)
Test#2 (FP)
85.61k
82.43k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.87k
42.59k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.05k
9.66k (x1.2)
TOTAL
169.07k
224.7k (x1.33)
Performance/W
i7-10510U
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
3635 points/W
948 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5707 points/W
868 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1391 points/W
448 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
537 points/W
102 points/W
TOTAL
11271 points/W
2365 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10510U
E5-2620
Test#1 (Integers)
3576 points/GHz
2780 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5457 points/GHz
2494 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1269 points/GHz
1220 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2720 points/GHz
1024 points/GHz
TOTAL
13022 points/GHz
7519 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4