Core i7-10510U vs i7-4820K
Description
The i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-4820K is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 169.1 k points while the i7-4820K gets 134.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10510U is 1.3 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 169.1 k points while the i7-4820K gets 134.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10510U is 1.3 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
306e4
Core
Comet Lake-U
Ivy Bridge -E
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2019
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
59.01k points
32.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
190.82k points
134.08k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10510U
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
17.52k
11.85k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
26.74k
11.84k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
4.69k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.33k
4.12k (x0.31)
TOTAL
63.81k
32.49k (x0.51)
Multithread
i7-10510U
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
54.53k
47.65k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
85.61k
54.81k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.87k
21.56k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.05k
10.05k (x1.25)
TOTAL
169.07k
134.08k (x0.79)
Performance/W
i7-10510U
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
3635 points/W
367 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5707 points/W
422 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1391 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
537 points/W
77 points/W
TOTAL
11271 points/W
1031 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10510U
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
3576 points/GHz
3039 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5457 points/GHz
3035 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1269 points/GHz
1201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2720 points/GHz
1056 points/GHz
TOTAL
13022 points/GHz
8331 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4