| | | | | | |

Core i7-10510U vs i5-4690


Description
The i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i5-4690 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 190.8 k points while the i5-4690 gets 163.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10510U is 1.2 times faster than the i5-4690 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
306c3
Core
Comet Lake-U
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
August 2019
June 2014
Mean monothread perf.
59.01k points
45.95k points
Mean multithread perf.
190.82k points
163.95k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10510U
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
22.85k
22.97k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
21.15k
13.02k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
5.21k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.24k
4.74k (x0.46)
TOTAL
59.01k
45.95k (x0.78)

Multithread

i7-10510U

i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
86.08k
85.98k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
79.78k
49.01k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.26k
19.5k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.69k
9.46k (x1.41)
TOTAL
190.82k
163.95k (x0.86)

Performance/W
i7-10510U
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
5739 points/W
1024 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5319 points/W
583 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1217 points/W
232 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
446 points/W
113 points/W
TOTAL
12721 points/W
1952 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10510U
i5-4690
Test#1 (Integers)
4664 points/GHz
5889 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4316 points/GHz
3339 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
975 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2089 points/GHz
1216 points/GHz
TOTAL
12044 points/GHz
11781 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4