| | | | | | |

Core i7-10510U vs i3-8350K


Description
The i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i3-8350K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 190.8 k points while the i3-8350K gets 237.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-8350K is 1.2 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
906eb
Core
Comet Lake-U
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
15 W
91 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2019
October 2017
Mean monothread perf.
59.01k points
68.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
190.82k points
237.63k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10510U
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
22.85k
27.29k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
21.15k
24.19k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
5.75k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.24k
11.13k (x1.09)
TOTAL
59.01k
68.36k (x1.16)

Multithread

i7-10510U

i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
86.08k
107.78k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
79.78k
95.93k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.26k
22.65k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.69k
11.26k (x1.68)
TOTAL
190.82k
237.63k (x1.25)

Performance/W
i7-10510U
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
5739 points/W
1184 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5319 points/W
1054 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1217 points/W
249 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
446 points/W
124 points/W
TOTAL
12721 points/W
2611 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10510U
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
4664 points/GHz
6823 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4316 points/GHz
6048 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
975 points/GHz
1436 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2089 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
TOTAL
12044 points/GHz
17091 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4