Core i7-10510U vs Ryzen 9 3900X
Description
The i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3900X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 190.8 k points while the 3900X gets 756.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 4 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 190.8 k points while the 3900X gets 756.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 4 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-U
Matisse
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/24
TDP
15 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
August 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
59.01k points
72.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
190.82k points
756.3k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10510U
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.91k
4.46k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
20.01k
18.46k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.05k
8.05k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.16k
23.71k (x1.67)
TOTAL
45.13k
54.68k (x1.21)
Multithread
i7-10510U
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.79k
52.65k (x3.82)
Test#2 (FP)
70.21k
265.41k (x3.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.05k
140.78k (x7.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.04k
46.91k (x5.84)
TOTAL
112.09k
505.76k (x4.51)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10510U
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
17.66k
17.35k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
25.46k
25.87k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.4k
8.72k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.05k
27.86k (x1.98)
TOTAL
63.57k
79.8k (x1.26)
Multithread
i7-10510U
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
54.45k
201.57k (x3.7)
Test#2 (FP)
84.97k
284.41k (x3.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.26k
145.16k (x6.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.04k
100.56k (x12.51)
TOTAL
168.72k
731.7k (x4.34)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10510U
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
17.52k
16.95k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
26.74k
25.37k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
9.23k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.33k
24.83k (x1.86)
TOTAL
63.81k
76.38k (x1.2)
Multithread
i7-10510U
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
54.53k
196.31k (x3.6)
Test#2 (FP)
85.61k
290.5k (x3.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.87k
143.95k (x6.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.05k
64.92k (x8.06)
TOTAL
169.07k
695.69k (x4.11)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10510U
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
22.85k
16.73k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
21.15k
24.74k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
8.82k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.24k
22.22k (x2.17)
TOTAL
59.01k
72.51k (x1.23)
Multithread
i7-10510U
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
86.08k
248.24k (x2.88)
Test#2 (FP)
79.78k
309.66k (x3.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.26k
140.01k (x7.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.69k
58.39k (x8.72)
TOTAL
190.82k
756.3k (x3.96)
Performance/W
i7-10510U
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
5739 points/W
2364 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5319 points/W
2949 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1217 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
446 points/W
556 points/W
TOTAL
12721 points/W
7203 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10510U
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
4664 points/GHz
3638 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4316 points/GHz
5377 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
975 points/GHz
1917 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2089 points/GHz
4831 points/GHz
TOTAL
12044 points/GHz
15763 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4