Core i7-10510U vs Ryzen 9 3900
Description
The i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 3900 is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 190.8 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 3.6 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 190.8 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900 is 3.6 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
870f10
Core
Comet Lake-U
Matisse
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/24
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
August 2019
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
59.01k points
74.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
190.82k points
687.5k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10510U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
4.91k
4.39k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
20.01k
16.99k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.05k
7.74k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.16k
24.57k (x1.74)
TOTAL
45.13k
53.69k (x1.19)
Multithread
i7-10510U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
13.79k
48.45k (x3.51)
Test#2 (FP)
70.21k
230.81k (x3.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.05k
122.82k (x6.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.04k
54.73k (x6.81)
TOTAL
112.09k
456.8k (x4.08)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10510U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
17.66k
16.59k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
25.46k
24.55k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.4k
8.55k (x1.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.05k
26.28k (x1.87)
TOTAL
63.57k
75.97k (x1.19)
Multithread
i7-10510U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
54.45k
181.33k (x3.33)
Test#2 (FP)
84.97k
261.01k (x3.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.26k
126.62k (x5.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.04k
66.64k (x8.29)
TOTAL
168.72k
635.6k (x3.77)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10510U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
17.52k
16.16k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
26.74k
23.75k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
9.32k (x1.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.33k
23.17k (x1.74)
TOTAL
63.81k
72.4k (x1.13)
Multithread
i7-10510U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
54.53k
174.73k (x3.2)
Test#2 (FP)
85.61k
275.63k (x3.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.87k
125.65k (x6.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.05k
44.17k (x5.48)
TOTAL
169.07k
620.18k (x3.67)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10510U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
22.85k
16.85k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
21.15k
26.03k (x1.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
9.54k (x2)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.24k
22.55k (x2.2)
TOTAL
59.01k
74.97k (x1.27)
Multithread
i7-10510U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
86.08k
229.41k (x2.67)
Test#2 (FP)
79.78k
292.81k (x3.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.26k
128.48k (x7.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.69k
36.8k (x5.5)
TOTAL
190.82k
687.5k (x3.6)
Performance/W
i7-10510U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
5739 points/W
3529 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5319 points/W
4505 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1217 points/W
1977 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
446 points/W
566 points/W
TOTAL
12721 points/W
10577 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10510U
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
4664 points/GHz
3920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4316 points/GHz
6054 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
975 points/GHz
2218 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2089 points/GHz
5243 points/GHz
TOTAL
12044 points/GHz
17435 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4