Core i7-10510U vs Ryzen 7 2700X
Description
The i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2700X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 190.8 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 2.3 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 190.8 k points while the 2700X gets 431.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 2.3 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
800f82
Core
Comet Lake-U
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
15 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
59.01k points
64.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
190.82k points
431.14k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10510U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4.91k
4.25k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
20.01k
19.72k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.05k
5.84k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.16k
21.36k (x1.51)
TOTAL
45.13k
51.17k (x1.13)
Multithread
i7-10510U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.79k
35.04k (x2.54)
Test#2 (FP)
70.21k
181.42k (x2.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.05k
64.86k (x3.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.04k
8.21k (x1.02)
TOTAL
112.09k
289.54k (x2.58)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10510U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
17.66k
15.22k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
25.46k
24.12k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.4k
5.87k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.05k
21k (x1.49)
TOTAL
63.57k
66.21k (x1.04)
Multithread
i7-10510U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
54.45k
126.81k (x2.33)
Test#2 (FP)
84.97k
229.86k (x2.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.26k
61.74k (x2.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.04k
9.77k (x1.22)
TOTAL
168.72k
428.19k (x2.54)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10510U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
17.52k
14.44k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
26.74k
24.92k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
5.8k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.33k
19.07k (x1.43)
TOTAL
63.81k
64.24k (x1.01)
Multithread
i7-10510U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
54.53k
122.01k (x2.24)
Test#2 (FP)
85.61k
220.34k (x2.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.87k
59.89k (x2.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.05k
9.9k (x1.23)
TOTAL
169.07k
412.13k (x2.44)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10510U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
22.85k
15.34k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
21.15k
25.75k (x1.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
5.79k (x1.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.24k
17.95k (x1.75)
TOTAL
59.01k
64.83k (x1.1)
Multithread
i7-10510U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
86.08k
123.07k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
79.78k
239.3k (x3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.26k
60.6k (x3.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.69k
8.18k (x1.22)
TOTAL
190.82k
431.14k (x2.26)
Performance/W
i7-10510U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
5739 points/W
1172 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5319 points/W
2279 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1217 points/W
577 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
446 points/W
78 points/W
TOTAL
12721 points/W
4106 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10510U
2700X
Test#1 (Integers)
4664 points/GHz
3568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4316 points/GHz
5987 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
975 points/GHz
1347 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2089 points/GHz
4175 points/GHz
TOTAL
12044 points/GHz
15078 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4