Core i7-10510U vs Ryzen 5 2600X
Description
The i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2600X is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 190.8 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.7 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 190.8 k points while the 2600X gets 333.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600X is 1.7 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
800f82
Core
Comet Lake-U
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
59.01k points
66.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
190.82k points
333.12k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10510U
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
22.85k
15.75k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
21.15k
26.29k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
5.91k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.24k
18.48k (x1.81)
TOTAL
59.01k
66.44k (x1.13)
Multithread
i7-10510U
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
86.08k
94.49k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
79.78k
182.53k (x2.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.26k
45.95k (x2.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.69k
10.15k (x1.52)
TOTAL
190.82k
333.12k (x1.75)
Performance/W
i7-10510U
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
5739 points/W
995 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5319 points/W
1921 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1217 points/W
484 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
446 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
12721 points/W
3507 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10510U
2600X
Test#1 (Integers)
4664 points/GHz
3749 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4316 points/GHz
6261 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
975 points/GHz
1408 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2089 points/GHz
4401 points/GHz
TOTAL
12044 points/GHz
15819 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4