| | | | | | |

Core i7-10510U vs Ryzen 5 2600


Description
The i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 190.8 k points while the 2600 gets 292.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.5 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
800f82
Core
Comet Lake-U
Pinnacle Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
August 2019
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
59.01k points
57.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
190.82k points
292.31k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10510U
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
4.91k
3.41k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
20.01k
15.96k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.05k
4.69k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.16k
17.42k (x1.23)
TOTAL
45.13k
41.47k (x0.92)

Multithread

i7-10510U

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
13.79k
20.88k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
70.21k
110.37k (x1.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.05k
39.25k (x1.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.04k
6.66k (x0.83)
TOTAL
112.09k
177.16k (x1.58)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10510U
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
22.85k
13.83k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
21.15k
23.16k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
5.15k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.24k
15.18k (x1.48)
TOTAL
59.01k
57.33k (x0.97)

Multithread

i7-10510U

2600
Test#1 (Integers)
86.08k
83.44k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
79.78k
161.53k (x2.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.26k
40.62k (x2.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.69k
6.72k (x1)
TOTAL
190.82k
292.31k (x1.53)

Performance/W
i7-10510U
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
5739 points/W
1284 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5319 points/W
2485 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1217 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
446 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
12721 points/W
4497 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10510U
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
4664 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4316 points/GHz
5938 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
975 points/GHz
1321 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2089 points/GHz
3893 points/GHz
TOTAL
12044 points/GHz
14699 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4