Core i7-10510U vs Ryzen 5 2400G
Description
The i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 190.8 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 190.8 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
806ec
810f10
Core
Comet Lake-U
Raven Ridge
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2019
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
59.01k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
190.82k points
198.27k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i7-10510U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4.91k
3.8k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
20.01k
17.38k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.05k
5.17k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.16k
3.16k (x0.22)
TOTAL
45.13k
29.52k (x0.65)
Multithread
i7-10510U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
13.79k
15.28k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
70.21k
76.44k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.05k
27.48k (x1.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.04k
3.02k (x0.38)
TOTAL
112.09k
122.2k (x1.09)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i7-10510U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
17.66k
13.95k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
25.46k
20.7k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.4k
5.33k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.05k
3.03k (x0.22)
TOTAL
63.57k
43.01k (x0.68)
Multithread
i7-10510U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
54.45k
58.56k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
84.97k
92.95k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
21.26k
28.55k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.04k
2.98k (x0.37)
TOTAL
168.72k
183.04k (x1.08)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10510U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
17.52k
13.04k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
26.74k
22.35k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
5.37k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.33k
3.4k (x0.25)
TOTAL
63.81k
44.15k (x0.69)
Multithread
i7-10510U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
54.53k
56.49k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
85.61k
100.74k (x1.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.87k
28.21k (x1.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.05k
3.04k (x0.38)
TOTAL
169.07k
188.49k (x1.11)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10510U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
22.85k
14.2k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
21.15k
23.23k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
5.35k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.24k
5.18k (x0.51)
TOTAL
59.01k
47.96k (x0.81)
Multithread
i7-10510U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
86.08k
58.24k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
79.78k
105.72k (x1.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.26k
28.73k (x1.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.69k
5.59k (x0.83)
TOTAL
190.82k
198.27k (x1.04)
Performance/W
i7-10510U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
5739 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5319 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1217 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
446 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
12721 points/W
3050 points/W
Performance/GHz
i7-10510U
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
4664 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4316 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
975 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2089 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
12044 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4