| | | | | | |

Core i7-10510U vs FX 9590


Description
The i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the 9590 is based on Piledriver.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 169.1 k points while the 9590 gets 137.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-10510U is 1.2 times faster than the 9590. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
600f20
Core
Comet Lake-U
Vishera
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
4.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
Socket AM3+
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/8
TDP
15 W
220 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x2048 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2019
July 2013
Mean monothread perf.
59.01k points
32.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
190.82k points
137.65k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i7-10510U
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
17.52k
11.51k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
26.74k
9.57k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.22k
4.19k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.33k
7.14k (x0.54)
TOTAL
63.81k
32.41k (x0.51)

Multithread

i7-10510U

9590
Test#1 (Integers)
54.53k
55.13k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
85.61k
51.69k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
20.87k
27.02k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.05k
3.81k (x0.47)
TOTAL
169.07k
137.65k (x0.81)

Performance/W
i7-10510U
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
3635 points/W
251 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5707 points/W
235 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1391 points/W
123 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
537 points/W
17 points/W
TOTAL
11271 points/W
626 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10510U
9590
Test#1 (Integers)
3576 points/GHz
2302 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5457 points/GHz
1914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1269 points/GHz
837 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2720 points/GHz
1429 points/GHz
TOTAL
13022 points/GHz
6482 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4