| | | | | | |

Core i7-10510U vs i7-1185G7


Description
The i7-10510U is based on Comet Lake architecture while the i7-1185G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i7-10510U gets a score of 190.8 k points while the i7-1185G7 gets 230.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1185G7 is 1.2 times faster than the i7-10510U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
806ec
806c1
Core
Comet Lake-U
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.8 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.9 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1528
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
15 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
August 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
59.01k points
60.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
190.82k points
230.91k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i7-10510U
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
22.85k
24.35k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
21.15k
20.07k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.78k
8.61k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.24k
7.84k (x0.77)
TOTAL
59.01k
60.87k (x1.03)

Multithread

i7-10510U

i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
86.08k
93.58k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
79.78k
94.71k (x1.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
18.26k
33.28k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.69k
9.34k (x1.4)
TOTAL
190.82k
230.91k (x1.21)

Performance/W
i7-10510U
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
5739 points/W
3342 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
5319 points/W
3383 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1217 points/W
1189 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
446 points/W
334 points/W
TOTAL
12721 points/W
8247 points/W

Performance/GHz
i7-10510U
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4664 points/GHz
5074 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4316 points/GHz
4182 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
975 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2089 points/GHz
1633 points/GHz
TOTAL
12044 points/GHz
12682 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4