Core i5-520M vs i3-3110M
Description
The i5-520M is based on Westmere architecture while the i3-3110M is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-520M gets a score of 33.1 k points while the i3-3110M gets 37.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3110M is 1.1 times faster than the i5-520M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-520M gets a score of 33.1 k points while the i3-3110M gets 37.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-3110M is 1.1 times faster than the i5-520M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20652
306a9
Core
Arrandale
Ivy Bridge
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.933 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
FC-PGA 988
Socket G2 (988B) / BGA1023
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/4
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2010
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
15.93k points
17.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.14k points
33.81k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-520M
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
6.67k
6.66k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
4.59k
6.88k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
2.68k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.18k
2.6k (x1.2)
TOTAL
15.93k
18.83k (x1.18)
Multithread
i5-520M
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
13.75k
16.56k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
10.03k
11.7k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.67k
7.28k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.68k
2.25k (x0.84)
TOTAL
33.14k
37.78k (x1.14)
Performance/W
i5-520M
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
393 points/W
473 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
287 points/W
334 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
191 points/W
208 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
77 points/W
64 points/W
TOTAL
947 points/W
1080 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-520M
i3-3110M
Test#1 (Integers)
2275 points/GHz
2776 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1567 points/GHz
2868 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
849 points/GHz
1118 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
742 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
5433 points/GHz
7847 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4