Core i5-520M vs Celeron N5095
Description
The i5-520M is based on Westmere architecture while the N5095 is based on Tremont.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-520M gets a score of 33.1 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 2.8 times faster than the i5-520M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-520M gets a score of 33.1 k points while the N5095 gets 93.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N5095 is 2.8 times faster than the i5-520M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
20652
906c0
Core
Arrandale
Jasper Lake
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.933 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
FC-PGA 988
FCBGA 1338
Cores/Threads
2/4
4/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2010
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
15.93k points
26.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.14k points
93.26k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-520M
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
6.67k
10.08k (x1.51)
Test#2 (FP)
4.59k
10.11k (x2.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
4.06k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.18k
2.36k (x1.08)
TOTAL
15.93k
26.6k (x1.67)
Multithread
i5-520M
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
13.75k
36.86k (x2.68)
Test#2 (FP)
10.03k
38.51k (x3.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.67k
15.17k (x2.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.68k
2.72k (x1.01)
TOTAL
33.14k
93.26k (x2.81)
Performance/W
i5-520M
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
393 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
287 points/W
2567 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
191 points/W
1012 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
77 points/W
181 points/W
TOTAL
947 points/W
6217 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-520M
N5095
Test#1 (Integers)
2275 points/GHz
3475 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1567 points/GHz
3486 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
849 points/GHz
1399 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
742 points/GHz
814 points/GHz
TOTAL
5433 points/GHz
9174 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4