| | | | | | |

Core i5-520M vs Celeron G1610T


Description
The i5-520M is based on Westmere architecture while the G1610T is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-520M gets a score of 33.1 k points while the G1610T gets 38.6 k points.

Summarizing, the G1610T is 1.2 times faster than the i5-520M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
20652
306a9
Core
Arrandale
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.933 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
FC-PGA 988
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
2/4
2/2
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
2048 kB
Date
January 2010
December 2012
Mean monothread perf.
15.93k points
20.84k points
Mean multithread perf.
33.14k points
38.59k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-520M
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.67k
7.87k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
4.59k
7.14k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.49k
3.04k (x1.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.18k
2.79k (x1.28)
TOTAL
15.93k
20.84k (x1.31)

Multithread

i5-520M

G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.75k
15.12k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
10.03k
14.05k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.67k
5.94k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.68k
3.48k (x1.3)
TOTAL
33.14k
38.59k (x1.16)

Performance/W
i5-520M
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
393 points/W
432 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
287 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
191 points/W
170 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
77 points/W
99 points/W
TOTAL
947 points/W
1103 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-520M
G1610T
Test#1 (Integers)
2275 points/GHz
3423 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1567 points/GHz
3102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
849 points/GHz
1323 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
742 points/GHz
1211 points/GHz
TOTAL
5433 points/GHz
9060 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4