| | | | | | |

Core i5-450M vs i5-10400T


Description
The i5-450M is based on Westmere architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-450M gets a score of 29.1 k points while the i5-10400T gets 229.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10400T is 7.9 times faster than the i5-450M. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
20655
a0653
Core
Arrandale
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.4 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.667 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
Socket G1
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
2/4
6/12
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
2x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
3072 kB
12288 kB
Date
June 2010
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
12.93k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
29.1k points
307.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-450M
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1.61k
4k (x2.48)
Test#2 (FP)
3.8k
14.19k (x3.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.19k
4.62k (x2.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.65k
11.03k (x6.69)
TOTAL
9.25k
33.84k (x3.66)

Multithread

i5-450M

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
2.91k
22.77k (x7.82)
Test#2 (FP)
5.05k
96.59k (x19.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.28k
31.65k (x9.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.07k
2.45k (x0.8)
TOTAL
14.31k
153.46k (x10.72)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-450M
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
5.4k
12.61k (x2.34)
Test#2 (FP)
3.7k
17.94k (x4.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.06k
4.83k (x2.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.77k
10.81k (x6.09)
TOTAL
12.93k
46.19k (x3.57)

Multithread

i5-450M

i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
11.83k
74.62k (x6.31)
Test#2 (FP)
9.39k
119.63k (x12.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.31k
32.65k (x6.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.58k
2.52k (x0.98)
TOTAL
29.1k
229.42k (x7.88)

Performance/W
i5-450M
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
338 points/W
2132 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
268 points/W
3418 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
152 points/W
933 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
74 points/W
72 points/W
TOTAL
831 points/W
6555 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-450M
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
2024 points/GHz
3503 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1388 points/GHz
4984 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
772 points/GHz
1341 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
665 points/GHz
3003 points/GHz
TOTAL
4850 points/GHz
12831 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4