| | | | | | |

Core i5-9600KF vs Xeon X5670


Description
The i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the X5670 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600KF gets a score of 268.7 k points while the X5670 gets 115.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9600KF is 2.3 times faster than the X5670 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
206c2
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Westmere-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.933 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
6/6
6 /6
TDP
95 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2019
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
77.34k points
20.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
371.08k points
115.4k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
16.5k
8.35k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
24.35k
5.58k (x0.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.54k
3.32k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.59k
3k (x0.22)
TOTAL
60.98k
20.26k (x0.33)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
93.78k
49.72k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
134.47k
35.19k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.24k
21.88k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.22k
8.6k (x1.05)
TOTAL
268.71k
115.4k (x0.43)

Performance/W
i5-9600KF
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
987 points/W
523 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1415 points/W
370 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
339 points/W
230 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
91 points/W
TOTAL
2829 points/W
1215 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9600KF
X5670
Test#1 (Integers)
3586 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5294 points/GHz
1675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1422 points/GHz
997 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2954 points/GHz
900 points/GHz
TOTAL
13257 points/GHz
6078 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4