| | | | | | |

Core i5-9600KF vs Xeon E5-1660 v4


Description
The i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E5-1660 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600KF gets a score of 280.8 k points while the E5-1660 v4 gets 320.5 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-1660 v4 is 1.1 times faster than the i5-9600KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
406f1
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
6/6
8/16
TDP
95 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2019
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
77.34k points
37.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
371.08k points
320.49k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
16.92k
12.41k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
25.44k
17.23k (x0.68)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.36k
4.89k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.25k
3.07k (x0.23)
TOTAL
61.97k
37.6k (x0.61)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
95.51k
102.11k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
143.19k
156.5k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.85k
42.08k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
19.8k (x2.41)
TOTAL
280.77k
320.49k (x1.14)

Performance/W
i5-9600KF
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1005 points/W
729 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1507 points/W
1118 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
356 points/W
301 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
141 points/W
TOTAL
2955 points/W
2289 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9600KF
E5-1660 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3679 points/GHz
3266 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5530 points/GHz
4534 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1383 points/GHz
1286 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2880 points/GHz
809 points/GHz
TOTAL
13472 points/GHz
9895 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4