| | | | | | |

Core i5-9600KF vs i7-10750H


Description
The i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600KF gets a score of 371.1 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9600KF is 1.1 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
a0652
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
6/6
6/12
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
77.34k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
371.08k points
349.21k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.63k
4.69k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
19.43k
18.71k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.17k
5.84k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.82k
13.95k (x1.01)
TOTAL
44.04k
43.19k (x0.98)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
26.64k
18.79k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
110.11k
86.1k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.07k
27.42k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
5.27k (x0.64)
TOTAL
178.11k
137.58k (x0.77)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.5k
16.63k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
24.35k
24.17k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.54k
6.38k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.59k
13.69k (x1.01)
TOTAL
60.98k
60.87k (x1)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
93.78k
67.07k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
134.47k
107.95k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.24k
27.05k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.22k
5.07k (x0.62)
TOTAL
268.71k
207.14k (x0.77)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.92k
16.71k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
25.44k
25.45k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.36k
6.06k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.25k
13.2k (x1)
TOTAL
61.97k
61.43k (x0.99)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
95.51k
67.59k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
143.19k
111.94k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.85k
27.7k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
5.3k (x0.65)
TOTAL
280.77k
212.53k (x0.76)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
30.52k
29.06k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
26.54k
26.49k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
6.23k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.87k
13.89k (x1)
TOTAL
77.34k
75.67k (x0.98)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
174.66k
154.61k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
154.06k
151.34k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.11k
36.33k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
6.93k (x0.84)
TOTAL
371.08k
349.21k (x0.94)

Performance/W
i5-9600KF
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1839 points/W
3436 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1622 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
359 points/W
807 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
154 points/W
TOTAL
3906 points/W
7760 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9600KF
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6635 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5769 points/GHz
5298 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1394 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3015 points/GHz
2778 points/GHz
TOTAL
16813 points/GHz
15133 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4