Core i5-9600KF vs i5-10400T
Description
The i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-10400T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600KF gets a score of 371.1 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9600KF is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600KF gets a score of 371.1 k points while the i5-10400T gets 307.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9600KF is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10400T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ec
a0653
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/6
6/12
TDP
95 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
77.34k points
57.85k points
Mean multithread perf.
371.08k points
307.18k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.63k
4k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
19.43k
14.19k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.17k
4.62k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.82k
11.03k (x0.8)
TOTAL
44.04k
33.84k (x0.77)
Multithread
i5-9600KF
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
26.64k
22.77k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
110.11k
96.59k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.07k
31.65k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
2.45k (x0.3)
TOTAL
178.11k
153.46k (x0.86)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.5k
12.61k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
24.35k
17.94k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.54k
4.83k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.59k
10.81k (x0.8)
TOTAL
60.98k
46.19k (x0.76)
Multithread
i5-9600KF
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
93.78k
74.62k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
134.47k
119.63k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
32.24k
32.65k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.22k
2.52k (x0.31)
TOTAL
268.71k
229.42k (x0.85)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
16.92k
12.5k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
25.44k
19.05k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.36k
4.72k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.25k
10.3k (x0.78)
TOTAL
61.97k
46.57k (x0.75)
Multithread
i5-9600KF
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
95.51k
74.58k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
143.19k
126.96k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.85k
31.76k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
2.5k (x0.3)
TOTAL
280.77k
235.8k (x0.84)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
30.52k
22k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
26.54k
19.98k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
4.57k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.87k
11.31k (x0.82)
TOTAL
77.34k
57.85k (x0.75)
Multithread
i5-9600KF
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
174.66k
136.69k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
154.06k
135.25k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.11k
32.76k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
2.48k (x0.3)
TOTAL
371.08k
307.18k (x0.83)
Performance/W
i5-9600KF
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
1839 points/W
3905 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1622 points/W
3864 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
359 points/W
936 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
3906 points/W
8776 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-9600KF
i5-10400T
Test#1 (Integers)
6635 points/GHz
6111 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5769 points/GHz
5549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1394 points/GHz
1268 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3015 points/GHz
3141 points/GHz
TOTAL
16813 points/GHz
16069 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4