| | | | | | |

Core i5-9600KF vs i5-10400F


Description
The i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600KF gets a score of 371.1 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9600KF is 1 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
a0653
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/6
6/12
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
77.34k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
371.08k points
369.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4.63k
4.3k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
19.43k
16.56k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.17k
5.25k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.82k
12.61k (x0.91)
TOTAL
44.04k
38.72k (x0.88)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
26.64k
18.1k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
110.11k
79.16k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.07k
26.75k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.3k
13.81k (x1.66)
TOTAL
178.11k
137.82k (x0.77)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
30.52k
26.28k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
26.54k
23.38k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
5.52k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.87k
12.96k (x0.93)
TOTAL
77.34k
68.14k (x0.88)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
174.66k
163.67k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
154.06k
159.74k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.11k
39k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
7.56k (x0.92)
TOTAL
371.08k
369.97k (x1)

Performance/W
i5-9600KF
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1839 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1622 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
359 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
3906 points/W
5692 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9600KF
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6635 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5769 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1394 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3015 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
16813 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4