| | | | | | |

Core i5-9600KF vs i5-1038NG7


Description
The i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-1038NG7 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600KF gets a score of 371.1 k points while the i5-1038NG7 gets 243.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9600KF is 1.5 times faster than the i5-1038NG7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
706e5
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
FCBGA1344
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
95 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
May 2020
Mean monothread perf.
77.34k points
65.35k points
Mean multithread perf.
371.08k points
243.18k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
30.52k
23.2k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
26.54k
21.2k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
9.4k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.87k
11.54k (x0.83)
TOTAL
77.34k
65.35k (x0.84)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
174.66k
94.68k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
154.06k
103.38k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.11k
35.79k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
9.33k (x1.13)
TOTAL
371.08k
243.18k (x0.66)

Performance/W
i5-9600KF
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
1839 points/W
3381 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1622 points/W
3692 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
359 points/W
1278 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
333 points/W
TOTAL
3906 points/W
8685 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9600KF
i5-1038NG7
Test#1 (Integers)
6635 points/GHz
6106 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5769 points/GHz
5580 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1394 points/GHz
2473 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3015 points/GHz
3037 points/GHz
TOTAL
16813 points/GHz
17197 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4