| | | | | | |

Core i5-9600KF vs Ryzen 7 4800H


Description
The i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 4800H is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600KF gets a score of 371.1 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 4800H is 1.2 times faster than the i5-9600KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
860f01
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
6/6
8/16
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
77.34k points
57.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
371.08k points
436.8k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
30.52k
16.59k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
26.54k
23.51k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
9.38k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.87k
7.98k (x0.58)
TOTAL
77.34k
57.47k (x0.74)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
174.66k
152.43k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
154.06k
195.79k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.11k
83.2k (x2.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
5.38k (x0.65)
TOTAL
371.08k
436.8k (x1.18)

Performance/W
i5-9600KF
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1839 points/W
3387 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1622 points/W
4351 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
359 points/W
1849 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
120 points/W
TOTAL
3906 points/W
9707 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9600KF
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
6635 points/GHz
3950 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5769 points/GHz
5599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1394 points/GHz
2234 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3015 points/GHz
1899 points/GHz
TOTAL
16813 points/GHz
13683 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4