Core i5-9600KF vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
Description
The i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3800XT is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600KF gets a score of 371.1 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 1.4 times faster than the i5-9600KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600KF gets a score of 371.1 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 1.4 times faster than the i5-9600KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ec
870f10
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/6
8/16
TDP
95 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
January 2019
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
77.34k points
78.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
371.08k points
508.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
30.52k
17.57k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
26.54k
27.38k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
9.35k (x1.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.87k
23.9k (x1.72)
TOTAL
77.34k
78.2k (x1.01)
Multithread
i5-9600KF
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
174.66k
176.08k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
154.06k
219.88k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.11k
100k (x2.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
12.93k (x1.57)
TOTAL
371.08k
508.89k (x1.37)
Performance/W
i5-9600KF
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
1839 points/W
1677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1622 points/W
2094 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
359 points/W
952 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
123 points/W
TOTAL
3906 points/W
4847 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-9600KF
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
6635 points/GHz
3738 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5769 points/GHz
5827 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1394 points/GHz
1989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3015 points/GHz
5085 points/GHz
TOTAL
16813 points/GHz
16638 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4