| | | | | | |

Core i5-9600KF vs Ryzen 7 1700


Description
The i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 1700 is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600KF gets a score of 371.1 k points while the 1700 gets 333.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9600KF is 1.1 times faster than the 1700. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ec
800f11
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/6
8/16
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2019
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
77.34k points
52.69k points
Mean multithread perf.
371.08k points
333.31k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
16.92k
13.95k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
25.44k
22.02k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.36k
5.17k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.25k
16.61k (x1.25)
TOTAL
61.97k
57.75k (x0.93)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
95.51k
120.59k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
143.19k
197.34k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
33.85k
56.83k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
6.41k (x0.78)
TOTAL
280.77k
381.16k (x1.36)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9600KF
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
30.52k
12.65k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
26.54k
20.95k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.41k
4.63k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.87k
14.47k (x1.04)
TOTAL
77.34k
52.69k (x0.68)

Multithread

i5-9600KF

1700
Test#1 (Integers)
174.66k
101.78k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
154.06k
177.57k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.11k
47.18k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.24k
6.78k (x0.82)
TOTAL
371.08k
333.31k (x0.9)

Performance/W
i5-9600KF
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
1839 points/W
1566 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1622 points/W
2732 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
359 points/W
726 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
87 points/W
104 points/W
TOTAL
3906 points/W
5128 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9600KF
1700
Test#1 (Integers)
6635 points/GHz
3419 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5769 points/GHz
5661 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1394 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3015 points/GHz
3911 points/GHz
TOTAL
16813 points/GHz
14241 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4