| | | | | | |

Core i5-9600K vs i9-10900K


Description
The i5-9600K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600K gets a score of 372.7 k points while the i9-10900K gets 685.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 1.8 times faster than the i5-9600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
a0655
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/6
10/20
TDP
95 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
20480 kB
Date
October 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
77.75k points
80.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.74k points
685.65k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9600K
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
16.91k
19.5k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
24.42k
28.01k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.37k
7.45k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.55k
15.82k (x1.17)
TOTAL
61.25k
70.79k (x1.16)

Multithread

i5-9600K

i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
95.21k
194.49k (x2.04)
Test#2 (FP)
137.3k
312.59k (x2.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.05k
89.14k (x2.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.4k
12.58k (x1.5)
TOTAL
276.96k
608.81k (x2.2)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9600K
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
30.64k
32.67k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
26.75k
28.49k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.33k
6.53k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.03k
12.72k (x0.91)
TOTAL
77.75k
80.41k (x1.03)

Multithread

i5-9600K

i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
174.92k
307.39k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
153.88k
298.47k (x1.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.93k
72.94k (x2.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
8k
6.85k (x0.86)
TOTAL
372.74k
685.65k (x1.84)

Performance/W
i5-9600K
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1841 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1620 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
378 points/W
583 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
3924 points/W
5485 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9600K
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
6661 points/GHz
6282 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5815 points/GHz
5479 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1376 points/GHz
1257 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3049 points/GHz
2445 points/GHz
TOTAL
16902 points/GHz
15463 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4