| | | | | | |

Core i5-9600K vs i5-10400F


Description
The i5-9600K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600K gets a score of 372.7 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9600K is 1 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
a0653
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
6/6
6/12
TDP
95 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
12288 kB
Date
October 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
77.75k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.74k points
369.97k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9600K
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
4.69k
4.3k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
19.35k
16.56k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.08k
5.25k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.81k
12.61k (x0.91)
TOTAL
43.93k
38.72k (x0.88)

Multithread

i5-9600K

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
26.24k
18.1k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
107.95k
79.16k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.5k
26.75k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.1k
13.81k (x1.7)
TOTAL
176.79k
137.82k (x0.78)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9600K
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
30.64k
26.28k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
26.75k
23.38k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.33k
5.52k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.03k
12.96k (x0.92)
TOTAL
77.75k
68.14k (x0.88)

Multithread

i5-9600K

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
174.92k
163.67k (x0.94)
Test#2 (FP)
153.88k
159.74k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.93k
39k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
8k
7.56k (x0.95)
TOTAL
372.74k
369.97k (x0.99)

Performance/W
i5-9600K
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1841 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1620 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
378 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
3924 points/W
5692 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9600K
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
6661 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5815 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1376 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3049 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
16902 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4