| | | | | | |

Core i5-9600K vs i5-1035G1


Description
The i5-9600K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600K gets a score of 372.7 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9600K is 2.2 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
706e5
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
95 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
6144 kB
Date
October 2018
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
77.75k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.74k points
171.65k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9600K
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
4.69k
3.88k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
19.35k
14.98k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.08k
9.7k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.81k
8.6k (x0.62)
TOTAL
43.93k
37.15k (x0.85)

Multithread

i5-9600K

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
26.24k
14.61k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
107.95k
54.9k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.5k
27.58k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.1k
5.04k (x0.62)
TOTAL
176.79k
102.13k (x0.58)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9600K
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
16.91k
12.89k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
24.42k
18.55k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.37k
9.93k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.55k
9.54k (x0.7)
TOTAL
61.25k
50.91k (x0.83)

Multithread

i5-9600K

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
95.21k
50.06k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
137.3k
66.1k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.05k
20.24k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.4k
5.51k (x0.66)
TOTAL
276.96k
141.91k (x0.51)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9600K
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
16.75k
13.58k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
25.5k
19.53k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.17k
9.37k (x1.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.06k
9.23k (x0.71)
TOTAL
61.48k
51.7k (x0.84)

Multithread

i5-9600K

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
96.03k
56.25k (x0.59)
Test#2 (FP)
143.78k
73.73k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.06k
29.56k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.45k
5.39k (x0.64)
TOTAL
283.33k
164.94k (x0.58)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9600K
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
30.64k
21.5k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
26.75k
17.71k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.33k
7.92k (x1.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.03k
8.24k (x0.59)
TOTAL
77.75k
55.37k (x0.71)

Multithread

i5-9600K

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
174.92k
73.03k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
153.88k
68.19k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.93k
24.89k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
8k
5.54k (x0.69)
TOTAL
372.74k
171.65k (x0.46)

Performance/W
i5-9600K
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
1841 points/W
4869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1620 points/W
4546 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
378 points/W
1660 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
369 points/W
TOTAL
3924 points/W
11443 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9600K
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
6661 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5815 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1376 points/GHz
2201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3049 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
16902 points/GHz
15381 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4