Core i5-9600K vs Ryzen 7 3800XT
Description
The i5-9600K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 3800XT is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600K gets a score of 372.7 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 1.4 times faster than the i5-9600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600K gets a score of 372.7 k points while the 3800XT gets 508.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 3800XT is 1.4 times faster than the i5-9600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
870f10
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/6
8/16
TDP
95 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
2x16384 kB
Date
October 2018
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
77.75k points
78.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.74k points
508.89k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9600K
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
30.64k
17.57k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
26.75k
27.38k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.33k
9.35k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.03k
23.9k (x1.7)
TOTAL
77.75k
78.2k (x1.01)
Multithread
i5-9600K
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
174.92k
176.08k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
153.88k
219.88k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.93k
100k (x2.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
8k
12.93k (x1.62)
TOTAL
372.74k
508.89k (x1.37)
Performance/W
i5-9600K
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
1841 points/W
1677 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1620 points/W
2094 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
378 points/W
952 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
123 points/W
TOTAL
3924 points/W
4847 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-9600K
3800XT
Test#1 (Integers)
6661 points/GHz
3738 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5815 points/GHz
5827 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1376 points/GHz
1989 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3049 points/GHz
5085 points/GHz
TOTAL
16902 points/GHz
16638 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4