| | | | | | |

Core i5-9600K vs Ryzen 7 1700X


Description
The i5-9600K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 1700X is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600K gets a score of 372.7 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 1700X is 1 times faster than the i5-9600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
800f11
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Summit Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/6
8/16
TDP
95 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
October 2018
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
77.75k points
56.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.74k points
372.73k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9600K
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
16.75k
12.5k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
25.5k
22.92k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.17k
5.45k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.06k
14.72k (x1.13)
TOTAL
61.48k
55.59k (x0.9)

Multithread

i5-9600K

1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
96.03k
92.51k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
143.78k
144.76k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.06k
54.43k (x1.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.45k
22.08k (x2.61)
TOTAL
283.33k
313.78k (x1.11)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9600K
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
30.64k
13.72k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
26.75k
22.48k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.33k
5.12k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.03k
15.44k (x1.1)
TOTAL
77.75k
56.76k (x0.73)

Multithread

i5-9600K

1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
174.92k
110.92k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
153.88k
200.56k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.93k
54.24k (x1.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
8k
7.01k (x0.88)
TOTAL
372.74k
372.73k (x1)

Performance/W
i5-9600K
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
1841 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1620 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
378 points/W
571 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
3924 points/W
3923 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9600K
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
6661 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5815 points/GHz
5916 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1376 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3049 points/GHz
4063 points/GHz
TOTAL
16902 points/GHz
14938 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4