Core i5-9600K vs Ryzen 5 4600H
Description
The i5-9600K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the 4600H is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600K gets a score of 372.7 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9600K is 1.1 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600K gets a score of 372.7 k points while the 4600H gets 334.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9600K is 1.1 times faster than the 4600H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ed
860f01
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Renoir
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
6/6
6/12
TDP
95 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
October 2018
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
77.75k points
54.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.74k points
334.72k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9600K
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
30.64k
15.48k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
26.75k
22.82k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.33k
8.63k (x1.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.03k
7.17k (x0.51)
TOTAL
77.75k
54.11k (x0.7)
Multithread
i5-9600K
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
174.92k
117.98k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
153.88k
146.43k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.93k
65.54k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
8k
4.77k (x0.6)
TOTAL
372.74k
334.72k (x0.9)
Performance/W
i5-9600K
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
1841 points/W
2622 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1620 points/W
3254 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
378 points/W
1456 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
106 points/W
TOTAL
3924 points/W
7438 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-9600K
4600H
Test#1 (Integers)
6661 points/GHz
3870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5815 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1376 points/GHz
2158 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3049 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
TOTAL
16902 points/GHz
13526 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4