| | | | | | |

Core i5-9600K vs i7-1165G7


Description
The i5-9600K is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the i7-1165G7 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9600K gets a score of 372.7 k points while the i7-1165G7 gets 210.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-9600K is 1.8 times faster than the i7-1165G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ed
806c1
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Tiger Lake-UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.6 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
6/6
4/8
TDP
95 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
12288 kB
Date
October 2018
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
77.75k points
62.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
372.74k points
210.4k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
i5-9600K
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
4.69k
4.26k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
19.35k
19.54k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.08k
10.95k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.81k
11.08k (x0.8)
TOTAL
43.93k
45.84k (x1.04)

Multithread

i5-9600K

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
26.24k
15.69k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
107.95k
68.3k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
34.5k
33.66k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.1k
12.16k (x1.5)
TOTAL
176.79k
129.81k (x0.73)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9600K
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
16.91k
14.48k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
24.42k
24.18k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.37k
11.95k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.55k
11.01k (x0.81)
TOTAL
61.25k
61.62k (x1.01)

Multithread

i5-9600K

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
95.21k
50.98k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
137.3k
80.7k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
36.05k
36.61k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.4k
12.02k (x1.43)
TOTAL
276.96k
180.32k (x0.65)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9600K
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
16.75k
16.27k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
25.5k
25.74k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.17k
11.5k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
13.06k
10.82k (x0.83)
TOTAL
61.48k
64.32k (x1.05)

Multithread

i5-9600K

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
96.03k
54k (x0.56)
Test#2 (FP)
143.78k
88.76k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.06k
35.23k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.45k
12.14k (x1.44)
TOTAL
283.33k
190.12k (x0.67)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
i5-9600K
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
30.64k
22.97k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
26.75k
21.61k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.33k
8.99k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
14.03k
8.52k (x0.61)
TOTAL
77.75k
62.1k (x0.8)

Multithread

i5-9600K

i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
174.92k
82.75k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
153.88k
86.58k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
35.93k
29.34k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
8k
11.72k (x1.47)
TOTAL
372.74k
210.4k (x0.56)

Performance/W
i5-9600K
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1841 points/W
2955 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1620 points/W
3092 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
378 points/W
1048 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
84 points/W
419 points/W
TOTAL
3924 points/W
7514 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9600K
i7-1165G7
Test#1 (Integers)
6661 points/GHz
4887 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5815 points/GHz
4599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1376 points/GHz
1912 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3049 points/GHz
1813 points/GHz
TOTAL
16902 points/GHz
13212 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4