Core i5-9500T vs Xeon E5-2690 0
Description
The i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 211.7 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 211.7 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500T is 1.1 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
906ea
206d7
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
6/6
8 /16
TDP
35 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
20480 kB
Date
July 2019
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
61.46k points
23.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
274.02k points
185.26k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9500T
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
13.46k
8.76k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
20.21k
7.35k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
3.86k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.25k
3.32k (x0.32)
TOTAL
48.64k
23.28k (x0.48)
Multithread
i5-9500T
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
74.65k
78.51k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
110.86k
66.46k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.08k
36.42k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
3.88k (x0.94)
TOTAL
211.7k
185.26k (x0.88)
Performance/W
i5-9500T
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
2133 points/W
582 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3167 points/W
492 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
631 points/W
270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
118 points/W
29 points/W
TOTAL
6049 points/W
1372 points/W
Performance/GHz
i5-9500T
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
3638 points/GHz
2305 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5462 points/GHz
1933 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1275 points/GHz
1015 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2771 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
TOTAL
13145 points/GHz
6127 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4