| | | | | | |

Core i5-9500T vs Xeon E5-2680 v2


Description
The i5-9500T is based on Coffee Lake architecture while the E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the i5-9500T gets a score of 211.7 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 2.6 times faster than the i5-9500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
906ea
306e4
Core
Coffee Lake-S
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
LGA 1151
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
6/6
10 /20
TDP
35 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x32+6x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
6x256 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
9216 kB
25600 kB
Date
July 2019
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
61.46k points
28.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
274.02k points
551.1k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
i5-9500T
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
12.4k
11.96k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
18.41k
10.73k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
4.59k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.48k
4.31k (x0.41)
TOTAL
45.98k
31.6k (x0.69)

Multithread

i5-9500T

E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
74.86k
218.24k (x2.92)
Test#2 (FP)
105.88k
206.92k (x1.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.34k
100.37k (x4.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.01k
11.45k (x2.86)
TOTAL
207.08k
536.99k (x2.59)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
i5-9500T
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
13.46k
10.55k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
20.21k
10.02k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.72k
3.99k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
10.25k
3.66k (x0.36)
TOTAL
48.64k
28.23k (x0.58)

Multithread

i5-9500T

E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
74.65k
215.04k (x2.88)
Test#2 (FP)
110.86k
230.43k (x2.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
22.08k
96.87k (x4.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.12k
8.76k (x2.13)
TOTAL
211.7k
551.1k (x2.6)

Performance/W
i5-9500T
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
2133 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3167 points/W
2004 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
631 points/W
842 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
118 points/W
76 points/W
TOTAL
6049 points/W
4792 points/W

Performance/GHz
i5-9500T
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3638 points/GHz
2931 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5462 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1275 points/GHz
1109 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
2771 points/GHz
1017 points/GHz
TOTAL
13145 points/GHz
7841 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4